May 17, 2012, 04:12 AM // 04:12
|
#1
|
Forge Runner
Join Date: May 2008
Location: East Anglia, UK
Guild: Order of [Thay]
Profession: N/
|
Want to see something hilarious? [AP_Ele]
http://www.gwpvx.com/Build:E/A_Assas...e_Elementalist
trolololol. (on the brink of being trashed, again)
So, my question to you all: what else is there to run for an elementalist human if AP Air/Earth/Fire is all terrible/trash/outdated, etc.?
What makes Elemental Attunement fire better/worse for a human? (afaik, that's the only contender)
fyi, main reason to kill AP ele is:
1.AP can be replaced easily with AoS, Glyph of Renewal or 4040/EBSoW.
2.single-target damage blows since HM update.
Enjoy.
Last edited by HigherMinion; May 17, 2012 at 07:45 AM // 07:45..
|
|
|
May 17, 2012, 05:04 AM // 05:04
|
#2
|
Site Contributor
Join Date: Nov 2009
Location: Atlanta
Guild: [LIFE]
Profession: P/
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by HigherMinion
http://www.gwpvx.com/Build:E/A_Assas...e_Elementalist
trolololol.
So, my question to you all: what else is there to run for an elementalist human if AP Air/Earth/Fire is all terrible/trash/outdated, etc.?
What makes Elemental Attunement fire better/worse for a human? (afaik, that's the only contender)
fyi, main reason to kill AP ele is:
1.AP can be replaced easily with AoS, Glyph of Renewal or 4040/EBSoW.
2.single-target damage blows since HM update.
Enjoy.
|
I laugh when I see that bar on any profession. So painfully weak.
On topic, you bring up a good point, although I prefer Glyph of Energy with Earth Magic skills. I can't cast as quickly as using the above that you mentioned, but I don't have to worry about exhaustion
|
|
|
May 17, 2012, 12:10 PM // 12:10
|
#3
|
Forge Runner
|
Why am I brought up so often on the talk page ... doing things I didn't actually do too (i.e. test non-AP non-ER Elementalist bars) ...
That said, the big reason I didn't test any non-AP non-ER bars was because I used pre-nerf Invoke Lightning while I was capping elites for Skill Hunter, and can see no reason to use that over AP in general. I can certainly still see no reason now. EA Fire brings the damage, but it really doesn't do anything else, and the same applies to Searing Flames / Savannah Heat builds. It doesn't help either that while I can't create anything more effective, nobody else has either - or if they have, they haven't posted it.
If anyone has more effective Elementalist builds (give all eight skills + spec), if necessary with appropriate heroes to go along, by all means post them.
|
|
|
May 17, 2012, 03:08 PM // 15:08
|
#4
|
Krytan Explorer
Join Date: Dec 2005
Location: Louisiana
Profession: E/Me
|
That's the most ridiculous discussion I've ever seen. It's a great build imo. You can argue whether its just good or great, but disfavored? Someone at pvx has an agenda. And it's great for AoE. What makes anyone think its single target only? It does both.
AoS certainly is not a viable replacement for AP, even though it opens an elite slot. You can't count on the recharge. EA double attunement is a decent option but stil inferior. GoE plus earth skills is a fine build, but that doesn't make the AP ele "painfully weak." You're just not slotting the other skills or using the build correctly if its so weak for you.
|
|
|
May 17, 2012, 03:18 PM // 15:18
|
#5
|
Wilds Pathfinder
|
If you've read a couple of the talk pages on various builds, it's becomes blindly obvious that there's a lot of drama/'politics' (lol) going and people often downvote good bars or upvote crap just because of it or just to take the piss.
|
|
|
May 17, 2012, 03:37 PM // 15:37
|
#6
|
Lion's Arch Merchant
Join Date: May 2008
Location: Netherlands
Guild: The Saviors Of [EviL]
Profession: D/
|
And this is exactly why you should not take anything posted on pvx to seriously.
Its a bunch of idiots that have no clue about how to play this game yet act like they are the Gods of GW, while in essence they run crappy or sub optimal bullshit at best.
AP eles are pretty solid, and deserve a minimum of a 'good' rating.
Then again, most people know by now that PvX is inhabited by idiots, so whats new.
|
|
|
May 17, 2012, 05:32 PM // 17:32
|
#7
|
Wilds Pathfinder
|
Most of the pvp bars are, for the most part, fairly legit because there is a moderately reliable process of vetting them, so bs votes for those tend to be spotted and deleted more quickly.
But the pve side is often a joke.
|
|
|
May 18, 2012, 07:10 PM // 19:10
|
#8
|
Forge Runner
Join Date: May 2008
Location: East Anglia, UK
Guild: Order of [Thay]
Profession: N/
|
Instead of arguing why PvX is bad, how about the topic of AP ele? Are their reasons valid? Does Rodgort's or SF really deal enough damage to single targets to challenge AP?
|
|
|
May 19, 2012, 02:50 AM // 02:50
|
#9
|
Wilds Pathfinder
Join Date: Jul 2008
Location: Fissure of Woe
Guild: [LOD]/[GS]/[DL]/[LOD*]
Profession: N/P
|
Too many people on the bandwagon to save it now tbh. People dont realize how much damage AP->ymlad->fh->tab->repeat does after your team's main aoe hits or how big of a deal sniping out monks in HM areas that are actually full of decent healers is
|
|
|
May 19, 2012, 03:27 AM // 03:27
|
#10
|
Forge Runner
Join Date: May 2008
Location: East Anglia, UK
Guild: Order of [Thay]
Profession: N/
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Life Bringing
Too many people on the bandwagon to save it now tbh. People dont realize how much damage AP->ymlad->fh->tab->repeat does after your team's main aoe hits or how big of a deal sniping out monks in HM areas that are actually full of decent healers is
|
Correction, two people don't realise. The rest are just circlejerking.
|
|
|
May 19, 2012, 03:35 AM // 03:35
|
#11
|
Desert Nomad
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by HigherMinion
Instead of arguing why PvX is bad, how about the topic of AP ele? Are their reasons valid? Does Rodgort's or SF really deal enough damage to single targets to challenge AP?
|
Meh, the retarded community over at GWPVX.com deserves some attention. Theres so many bad players pretending to be bigshots there it's not even funny, and only Toraen and a handful (literraly) of others to maintain sanity.
The fact that they voted down one of the very best builds in the entire game speaks for itself. And it's not the first time.
|
|
|
May 19, 2012, 03:45 AM // 03:45
|
#12
|
Forge Runner
Join Date: May 2008
Location: East Anglia, UK
Guild: Order of [Thay]
Profession: N/
|
Maybe it just needs an influx of Guru members to fix it. If there is more Guru community and sane editors, circle-jerking can't happen as easily
gogo make accounts!
|
|
|
May 19, 2012, 08:39 AM // 08:39
|
#14
|
Forge Runner
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by HigherMinion
Instead of arguing why PvX is bad, how about the topic of AP ele? Are their reasons valid? Does Rodgort's or SF really deal enough damage to single targets to challenge AP?
|
SF is not good for damage while you can run Rodgort's with AP, don't get it. Whoever came up with the idea that AP Eles can only be of the Air variant ... ? And that AP Air Eles will be casting more Lightning Orbs than Chain Lightnings, too.
|
|
|
May 19, 2012, 08:55 AM // 08:55
|
#15
|
Forge Runner
Join Date: May 2008
Location: East Anglia, UK
Guild: Order of [Thay]
Profession: N/
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Jeydra
SF is not good for damage while you can run Rodgort's with AP, don't get it. Whoever came up with the idea that AP Eles can only be of the Air variant ... ? And that AP Air Eles will be casting more Lightning Orbs than Chain Lightnings, too.
|
No one is advocating only the Air version, as far as I can see. All three/four play styles are on the page, holding the energy storage version because it's more awkward to show on the combined page.
I agree SF sucks, but the argument is Rodgort's is on a short enough recharge not to require AP, but EA would be superior. Also that 4040's/ebsow can be used to free your elite slot. But the PvE skills can't be spammed and shouts aren't affected at all, so meh.
|
|
|
May 19, 2012, 11:40 AM // 11:40
|
#17
|
Tea Powered
Join Date: May 2008
Location: UK
Profession: N/
|
So long as that SF build doesn't reach 'great', I'm happy. Yes I'm petty.
But perhaps now you can feel smugly superior whilst using any AP build.
More seriously:
Quote:
Originally Posted by HigherMinion
Instead of arguing why PvX is bad, how about the topic of AP ele? Are their reasons valid? Does Rodgort's or SF really deal enough damage to single targets to challenge AP?
|
Whilst the OP was not most conducive to that, if the thread doesn't get off PvX, it'll be locked.
Quote:
Originally Posted by Gabs88
Meh, the retarded community over at GWPVX.com deserves some attention. Theres so many bad players pretending to be bigshots there it's not even funny, and only Toraen and a handful (literraly) of others to maintain sanity.
The fact that they voted down one of the very best builds in the entire game speaks for itself. And it's not the first time.
|
This may or may not be an appropriate place to discuss the state of the PvX community, but nothing constructive will come of it and the problems over there are very obvious.
Quote:
Originally Posted by HigherMinion
What makes Elemental Attunement fire better/worse for a human? (afaik, that's the only contender)
fyi, main reason to kill AP ele is:
1.AP can be replaced easily with AoS, Glyph of Renewal or 4040/EBSoW.
2.single-target damage blows since HM update.
|
Nothing makes EA Fire better than AP Fire. It is perhaps easier to run, with EA giving much better energy returns and an AP bar struggling to use the skill as often as it's recharged, but an AP bar quite honestly has better skills to use.
AP outclasses GoR, AoS is trash and a 40/40 isn't even something you can discuss in this context.
Single target damage vs AoE isn't too much of a consideration; we have Rodgort's and EVAS we can chain, with YMLAD, FH and possibly even an AoE Fireball to spike targets down.
Quote:
Originally Posted by wildclaw
Thirdly, the basic fire build should be GoS+MS+GoLE+FB/RI. There is no reason to run two damage only AoE spells with AP unless you are afraid of getting your AP dispelled (which is a defeatist mindset). The whole point of the AP build is to score frequent cooldown resets.
|
I've run this, several times. It's shit.* At least it's beaten by all the other AP builds I've run.
The problems are fairly obvious if you take a few seconds to think about it and a fear of missing AP isn't what motivates the current choice of skills on AP bars.
Hint: You cannot run two 25e skills on an AP bar.
*Whilst that judgement was made before the Ele update, Meteor Shower wasn't actually improved much by that update; Rodgort's Invocation was. RI was mostly held back by its energy cost and weakened damage output; we can cope with energy inefficiency if the damage is worthwhile. Damage was never the main concern with MS and its massive costs were in no way alleviated by the updated.
Last edited by Xenomortis; May 19, 2012 at 12:01 PM // 12:01..
|
|
|
May 19, 2012, 05:40 PM // 17:40
|
#18
|
Forge Runner
Join Date: May 2008
Location: East Anglia, UK
Guild: Order of [Thay]
Profession: N/
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Xenomortis
More seriously:
Whilst the OP was not most conducive to that, if the thread doesn't get off PvX, it'll be locked.
|
Sorry about the malice-injected OP, it was just annoying.
Something I find odd is they actually think Anet did such a good job fixing PvE with the Hard Mode update... I thought it was established it was a blanket nerf?
|
|
|
May 19, 2012, 05:44 PM // 17:44
|
#19
|
Pre-Searing Cadet
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Xenomortis
|
Running AP Ele without one of the required skills is not a good idea as demonstrated by your video. And no, Fire Attunement is not a replacement for GoLE, not by a long shot.
|
|
|
May 19, 2012, 06:15 PM // 18:15
|
#20
|
Tea Powered
Join Date: May 2008
Location: UK
Profession: N/
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by wildclaw
Running AP Ele without one of the required skills is not a good idea as demonstrated by your video. And no, Fire Attunement is not a replacement for GoLE, not by a long shot.
|
I know I should have run GoLE on that bar, but it doesn't significantly improve things (I have used it, just after that video was made); you can use EVAS a little more often but you're still pressed hard for energy.
|
|
|
Thread Tools |
|
Display Modes |
Linear Mode
|
Posting Rules
|
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts
HTML code is Off
|
|
|
All times are GMT. The time now is 06:29 PM // 18:29.
|